SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — The sun set early on a bill that sought to do away with daylight savings in South Dakota on Friday.

House defeats bill for new men’s prison

Senate Bill 186, brought by Republican Sen. Carl Perry, would have exempted the state of South Dakota from the practice of daylight savings, which runs from March 9 – November 2 in 2025, and at which time clocks are set forward one hour, causing the sun to both rise and set an hour later.

Perry, in advocating his bill, cited the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, arguing standard time better aligns with circadian rhythms and improves public health and safety.

Sleep is a major part of Perry’s equation, as he notes that daylight savings disrupts sleep cycles. He also added dark mornings can lead to increased risks of car crashes.

Republican Sen. Lauren Nelson also spoke in support of the measure, providing her views as teacher and how the time change loses them a week of instruction.

Nelson also advocated for keeping standard time as the year-round time, as opposed to full-time daylight savings, on account of the dangers of parents driving their kids to school in the dark in the morning.

Republican Sen. John Sjaarda gave opposition testimony, not from his position as a legislator, but as a farmer.

A challenge to find shelter for rural homeless people

“I love daylight savings time,” remarked Sjaarda. “I know it doesn’t change the amount of daylight in a day, but it moves one hour of daylight from when most people are sleeping like 4:00 in the morning to when people are awake like 8:00 in the evening.”

Sjaarda noted this extra hour is nice to have on the farm for when you’re baling, spraying or working with livestock.

“I know some of you will say just wake up an hour earlier. Well, that’s possible for me. But what about all the people who are working 8 to 5 jobs? They go home at 530. They want to go get a round of golf in before dark. They want to take the boat out to the lake and do some surfing with the family or do yard work,” said Sjaarda.

Also mentioned by Sjaarda were all the kids playing sports late in the summer and into autumn. “As the weeks go by and the sun keeps setting earlier and earlier, by the 1st of October, it’s getting dark by 7:00. If we don’t have daylight savings time, it’ll be dark by 6:00,” he said.

Ultimately, the arguments of the proponents failed to enlighten the committee, who upon a motion to defer the bill to the 41st day, voted to do so on an 8-1 vote, with Perry himself the only committee member voting against killing his bill.

“It just wasn’t ready for prime time, I guess,” quipped committee chair, Republican Sen. Jim Mehlhaff, with a chuckle. “What time was it,” replied Perry.

Giving comment to KELOLAND at the end of day on Friday, Perry explained that just because the bill failed, that does not mean there wasn’t support for it.

Perry cited the proponent testimony and added that he does think the issue should be looked at again in the future.

Benefits to sleep, safety and health were the main drivers of this bill, according to Perry, who called this a “constituent bill”, saying that his role is to listen to th constituents, and that this was what they wanted.